In the age of social media, images can quickly go viral and stir up heated discussions. Recently, a photo surfaced on various platforms, claiming to show a massive crowd greeting U.S. Vice President Kamala Harris and her running mate, Minnesota Governor Tim Walz, during their August 2024 rally in Detroit. This image sparked debates about its authenticity, leading to various claims that it was manipulated or generated by artificial intelligence.
As people shared the photo on platforms like X (formerly Twitter) and Facebook, many users expressed skepticism, suggesting that it had been altered or was entirely fake. For example, some users commented on its quality, with one asserting, "You can tell it's photoshopped." Others even went as far as to claim it was an AI-generated image, indicating a growing concern about the reliability of images in the digital age.
Former President Donald Trump also joined the conversation, stating that the image had been "A.I.'d" to fabricate a large crowd of supporters who, in his view, didn't actually exist. However, this article aims to clarify the situation by providing evidence and insights regarding the original photo taken during the event.
Understanding the Context of the Photo
On August 7, 2024, Vice President Kamala Harris and Governor Tim Walz landed in Detroit for a rally, part of their campaign trail in several battleground states. Shortly after their arrival, the photo in question emerged online, showing a crowd gathered around Air Force 2. The image quickly attracted attention, with many claiming it depicted a significant turnout.
However, the Harris-Walz campaign confirmed that the photo was authentic, taken by a staff member. They emphasized that there was no digital manipulation or use of AI tools involved in creating the image. Yet, it appears that the version of the image circulating online had been slightly modified, as it showed enhanced brightness and contrast, which may have fueled the debate about its authenticity.
Analyzing the Authenticity of the Image
To assess the credibility of the circulating photo, several AI-detection tools were employed. The first tool, Winston AI Image Detector, reported that it was "96% human," indicating a high likelihood that it was genuinely photographed rather than generated by AI. Another tool, Isitai.com, provided a slightly lower estimate, suggesting a 58% chance that the image was not AI-generated.
In many AI-generated images, anomalies such as unrecognizable facial features or unnatural body parts are common. However, the analysis of this photo did not reveal such characteristics, reinforcing its authenticity. By zooming in on the image, observers could also see attendees recording the event on their phones, further validating that a genuine crowd was present.
Comparative Images from the Event
To provide additional context, various images from the same event were located in the Associated Press' image archive. Notably, a photograph by photojournalist Carlos Osorio presented a similar perspective of the crowd, albeit under different lighting conditions. The AP photos depicted a roof hangar casting shadows over parts of the crowd, confirming the presence of many supporters holding campaign signs.
Ultimately, the BBC reported that the photo was legitimate and confirmed by a spokesperson for the Harris-Walz campaign. The campaign reiterated that there had been no manipulation or AI involvement in its creation, aiming to dispel the rumors surrounding the image.